Deputy DPP slams PM for Emailgate claims: No One Cleared

By Irving Ward
May 14, 2015 – guardian.co.tt

Prime Minister Kamla Persad-BissessarDeputy Director of Public Prosecutions Joan Honore-Paul last night slammed Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar for her suggestion that she and her colleagues should be cleared in the Emailgate probe, saying the police were far from done with their investigations and the case was still wide open.

She also chastised Persad-Bissessar for releasing contents of reports provided to the police from the US Department of Justice, saying that the treaty under which this information was provided prohibited anyone else other than the national security parties probing the matter to use it.

Honore-Paul’s comment comes days after Persad-Bissessar and members of her party attacked Opposition Leader Dr Keith Rowley over the Emailgate matter in the wake of his suspension from Parliament last week. The Government used some of the information from the US Department of Justice report during the debate of censure against Rowley.

Using social media earlier this week, Persad-Bissessar had also taken Rowley to task after her US-based lawyer, Jack Russo, suggested that both she and former attorney general Anand Ramlogan had been cleared after Google Inc had provided information which suggested there was no match for any of the emails presented in the documents by Rowley in the House in 2013.

Persad-Bissessar had also called on the police to expedite the matter, noting that her Government should not be facing the spectre of such an allegation heading into a general election.

But dealing specifically with the issue of whether the case was close to an end, Honore-Paul said, “This investigation relates not only to whether the emails were in fact sent in September 2012 but also whether there may have been acts by particular persons which amount to misconduct in public office. “The investigation necessarily includes an examination of events outside of the four corners of the purported email correspondence, since these may have the potential to confirm or refute the disputed email communications.”

Request for help

She said the police team started its investigations after the purported emails were forwarded by the PM to acting Commissioner of Police Stephen Williams in 2013 for investigation. She said since then the police had requested help, through the Central Authority, from the US Department of Justice and it was facilitated because the request was supported by “evidence which met the required level of ‘probable cause.’

She said the US Department of Justice acting on the request served a warrant on certain service providers in the US, among them Google Inc, and subsequently forwarded that information to the Central Authority, which in turn passed it to DCP Glen Hackett, who is heading the local probe.

She said, “While it is true, that after receipt of the information from the Department of Justice, the police team led by Superintendent Baldeo Nanan did send a report to Deputy Commissioner of Police Glen Hackett, it is not true that such report cleared Mr Anand Ramlogan and Mrs Kamla Persad-Bissessar in respect of this investigation.”

She added, “The United States Department of Justice’s response did not treat with all the matters requested by the investigative team and further, the United States Department of Justice is yet to relay any information related to the Hotmail accounts “captaingarygriffith@hotmail.com” and “surujrambachan@hotmail.com.

“They have indicated that such information will be sent as soon as possible. Quite properly, there was absolutely no finding made by the United States Department of Justice nor was any disclosed in written correspondence. The United States Department of Justice was concerned only with relaying the data or information that was received by virtue of the above-mentioned warrant. This is its legal remit.”

She concluded that any attempt to give the “impression that there has been some finality in this regard is misleading.”

Natural justice

Dealing with the release of the information in the public domain, Honore-Paul said she had noted several media articles which quoted from various document provided by the US State Department to the local investigators. However, she cautioned, “Any parallel investigation by interested parties and the public airing of the supposed results are palpably self-serving and bring to mind the need for the legal maxim, “no man should be a judge in his own cause.”

“This is a bedrock principle of natural justice, the rule of law and due process. It exists to ensure impartiality by the disqualification of potentially biased or interested parties in the investigations.

“Further, notwithstanding the fact that the T&T Police Service has the institutional strength and history to withstand pressure from whatever source, the publication of this information derived from private sources, has the potential to interfere with the investigations being conducted by independent and impartial bodies, such as the Integrity Commission and the T&T Police Service. Moreover, it has the potential to interfere with the public perception of the soundness of these investigations.”

She also said the use of the information in the “public arena without the permission of one’s international partner is especially disturbing and dangerous, since such action violates what is expected by way of international cooperation and more particularly, it attracts questions marks as to our ability to honour our international legal obligations, thus potentially influencing, negatively, the outcome of future requests by Trinidad and Tobago for Mutual Legal Assistance.”

Full Article : guardian.co.tt

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Deputy DPP: Kamla, Anand not cleared
DEPUTY Director of Public Prosecutions Joan Honore-Paul is debunking claims that Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar and former Attorney General Anand Ramlogan have been cleared in the “emailgate” investigation.

Govt has declared war on citizens
FORMER attorney general under a United National Con­gress (UNC) government Ram­esh Lawrence Maharaj said yesterday the People’s Partnership Government has “declared war” on the pop­ulation through its “unconstitutional” suspension of Opposition Leader Dr Keith Rowley from Parliament two weeks ago.

Faris: Emailgate is not over
OPPOSITION Senator Faris Al-Rawi yesterday hailed the independence of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), reacting to the statement by Deputy DPP Joan Honore-Paul who urged everyone to give space to the police and Integrity Commission to probe Emailgate.

16 Responses to “Deputy DPP slams PM for Emailgate claims: No One Cleared”


  • Jerry C. Hussain

    CLEARLY THE UNC IS A LAW ONTO THEMSELVES DESIGNED TO POLITICALLY LET THEM OFF THE HOOK WHILE THEY CASTRATE DR. ROWLEY AND DESTROY OUR COUNTRY WHILE THEY THIEF MORE THAN 1996 TO 2002. FOLKS WE NEED TO GET RID OF THIS UNC GOVERNMENT. I SAY WE ASK THEM TO RESIGN NOW AND CALL ELECTIONS ASAP. YOU KNOW WHEN YOU ARE JUST NO GOOD IT WILL SHOW. ALL THE YEARS OF PNM MINISTEPS DO NOT COMPARE TO THIS MESS OF GOVERNMENT MINISTERS OF FALSE PAPERS, CORRUPTION, LIES, BOLDFACEDNESS , NASTY GREEDINESS, SICKOOS, SELFISH, GOONS ETC. THIS IS THE WORST GOVERNMENT EVER AND EVERYDAY NOW MORE SKELETONS COME OUT OF THE CLOSET WITH THEM. OUR COUNTRIES ARE NOW HURTING BADLY. WE NEED TO ACT NOW.

    • Lets deal with the facts:
      (1) Rowley found some emails, in his mailbox, or somewhere.
      (2) The emails stated that there was a plot by the Prime Minister to kill a reporter, to bug the DPP office, to offer the DPP a judges position. All 31 emails implicated the Prime Minister, the Attorney General, the Minister of Works and the Former Minister of National Security
      (3)Instead of going to the police he sat with the information by his pillow for six months. He read it, pondered its contents, then visited his buddy Ken Gordon former Media Magnate now Integrity Commission Chairman. There they discuss the way forward. He suggested to Ken that he will go to Parliament and read the emails then refer it to the integrity commission.
      (4) In May 2013, Rowley, during his motion of no confidence against the People’s Partnership Government and the Prime Minister, disclosed the contents of 31 e-mails purporting to be exchanges between Persad-Bissessar, then-attorney general Ramlogan, former minister of local government Surujrattan Rambachan and then-national security adviser to the Prime Minister Gary Griffith. The e-mails alleged these high office-­holders were conspiring to harm a journalist; plant electronic spying devices in the Office of the DPP; offer the DPP a judgeship; and to accept payment from an unnamed woman in exchange for the freedom of people involved in the Section 34 fiasco in September 2012

      (5) facts about the emails:FACTS ABOUT THE E-MAILS
      1. anan@gmail does notexist and cannot be created due to gmail “6” characters requirement.

      2. The dates in some of the emails do not match real calendar dates.

      3. The time zone is not consistence

      4. Rowley has changed his tune about Thomas Smitham of the US Embassy involvement

      5. The date format “9/06/12” are wrong

      6. You cannot send one email from 2 different email addresses and the recipient would receive it as one email. In other words you cannot send an email from anan@gmail.com and anand@tstt.net.tt to kamlapb1@gmail.com and Kamla would receive one email.

      7. The Judiciary has denied any request was made to promote DPP Gaspard to a judge.

      8. The US Embassy has denied any knowledge of a conspiracy.

      9. Sunday Guardian editor Debra Wanser has denied anyone from the Government ever asked her to pull or suppress any story in connection with Section 34.

      10. The DPP has denied anyone from GOVT approached him about appointment as Judge

      11. United states information technology expert Jon Berryhill says the emails are fraudulent

      12. Acting Police Commissioner Stephen Williams admits emails fake

      13. US court Docs citing Google data: anand@tstt.net.tt DOES exist, but alleged Emailgate emails were never sent.

      14. US court docs, citing Google data: kamlapb1@gmail.com DOES exist, but Emailgate emails were never sent.

      15. January 15, 2015. AG Ramlogan wins emailgate defamation claim against Opposition leader Dr. Keith Rowley. Rowley and Al Rawi failed to file a defence in the law suit and asked for an extension. They did not honor the deadline date AGAIN and the judge has ruled against them.

      CONCLUSION: FAKE
      (6) the DPP office to date continue to show that Balisier house giving them orders. Immediately after Ramesh Maharaj and others came and spoke against the government the Deputy DPP came forward to corroborate their statement Yesterday releasing some gas for Neil Jerry and Kian.

  • What we have here is a very difficult situation.The Deputy DPP Honore-Paul presents a very logical argument that no one ought to be judge in his or her case.

    However, investigators and decision-makers must act without bias in all procedures connected with the making of a decision.

    A decision-maker must be impartial and must make a decision based on a balanced and considered assessment of the information and evidence before him or her without favoring one party over another.

    Even where no actual bias exists, investigators and decision-makers should be careful to avoid the appearance of bias. Investigators should ensure that there is no conflict of interest which would make it inappropriate for them to conduct the investigation.
    The question is , can the DPP Office and the Police be trusted in this investigation?
    The Police have already failed in meeting the principle of delayed justice, that is to deliver a resolution in a timely manner.
    The Office of the DPP has already showed its bias by suggesting that “The investigation necessarily includes an examination of events outside of the four corners of the purported email correspondence”, after admitting that the US Justice department’s findings are accurate. The PM verified this with her own lawyer’s investigation.
    I am confused. If the emails never existed, does that mean that they were fabricated?
    It is reasonable to assume that the DPP’s office, as well as the Police appear to be playing politics and utilizing delaying tactics. What is their motivation?

    • Jerry C. Hussain

      T-MAN, MAMOO, KAMLA UNC you need to UNDERSTAND WHAT DUE PROCESS MEANS ESPECIALLY WHERE TWO DIFFERENT COUNTRIES ARE INVOLVED……

      TAKE A READ AND EDUCATE YOUR CORRUPT MINDS…

      The Dep DPP’s letter: Dear politicians, hush

      Published on May 14, 2015, 11:30 am AST
      Updated on May 14, 2015, 12:42 pm AST
      By Multimedia Desk

      THE Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions Joan Honore-Paul’s six-page letter on Wednesday, called on those squabbling over the disputed emails disclosed by Opposition Leader Dr Keith Rowley in the Parliament in May 2013, to just stop talking, sharing documents, and hurting the country’s international image, until the Integrity Commission and Trinidad and Tobago Police Service, complete their investigations. You can read the full letter here –

      PRESS RELEASE

      BY THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS

      RE: INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE EMAIL DISCLOSURES IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES BETWEEN

      MAY 20, 2013 AND MAY 24, 2013

      Through various reports in the electronic and print media, it has become obvious that certain correspondence from the United States Department of Justice, sent to the Police Investigative team through the Central Authority, has found its way into the hands of parties who are not members of the Investigative or advising Prosecutorial teams. While the articles are numerous, the following excerpts are instructive:

      At page A3 of the Trinidad and Tobago Guardian of Saturday May 9th 2015, Richard Lord reports that the Honourable Prime Minister Mrs. Kamla Persad-Bissessar said that she:

      “had a duty to myself and the members of my Government to have that record cleared in the Parliament, because now is when we got the evidence from independent sources. “We got the evidence through court processes from Google, the Integrity Commission and the US Justice Department. “[emphasis mine]

      In another report at page 4 of the Daily Express of Thursday May 7th, 2015 Ms. Ria Taitt reported as follows:

      “Moonilal cited the number of authorities which said the e-mails were false. These included a report from an IT. Specialist in the Attorney General’s department, Mr. Roger Sealy; a report from John Berryhill, which called the document a ‘poorly constructed fraud; Jack Rousseau, of the Computer Law Group, in the case of the Integrity Commission versus Google; and the Report of the Justice Department to the head of Central Authority….”

      Further, the following is an excerpt from a. page 3 report in the Trinidad and Tobago Newsday of Monday April 27, 2015 by writer Andre Bagoo who reported in reference to the Honourable Prime Minister,

      “She said the latest disclosures of records to the Integrity Commission concurred with a report by John Berryhill — a former officer in the US Air Force Reserve Office of Special Investigations. They also concurred with disclosures to the Police Service done through the U.S Justice Department.”

      Mr. Bagoo ascribed the following words to the Honourable Prime Minister Mrs. Kamla Persad-Bissessar:

      “Three sources have now showed us there is no substance, no truth to the fake emails”

      In the Daily Express of Friday 8th May, 2015 at page 5 reporter Anna Ramdass recited the full text of a letter dated January 29 2015, from the Acting Director of the United States Department of Justice to Mr. Netram Kowlessar, Head of the Central Authority. This letter and its annexures, the product of a warrant obtained by the United States Department of Justice, were sent to the Police Investigative Team.

      It is apparent from the contents of this letter that it should not have found its way into the public domain, since information garnered by way of compliance with, requests for Mutual Legal Assistance, must be used by the receiving State, only in the investigation and prosecution of persons and offences for which assistance has been requested and granted. It is standard practice as it is universally accepted, that in those matters to use this information otherwise is only permissible with the express approval or authorisation of the United States Department of Justice.

      I am seized of information which clearly indicates that no such approval of authorisation from the United States Department of Justice was sought by the Central Authority or approved by the United States Department of Justice. It should be noted that the Central Authority is the only body legally authorised to make such a request.

      Therefore, the use of this information in the public arena, without the permission of one’s international partner is especially disturbing and dangerous, since such action violates what is to be expected by way of international cooperation and more particularly, it attracts question marks as to our ability to honour our international legal obligations, thus potentially influencing, negatively, the outcome of future requests by Trinidad and Tobago for Mutual Legal Assistance.

      Against this backdrop, the public interest demands that I place into the public domain my deep concern over these occurrences and urge those concerned, who should obviously know better, to act in a manner consonant with a greater sense of responsibility.

      It is also my view that this is an appropriate juncture to update the public on certain matters arising out of the police investigation, now commonly referred to as the “Emailgate Investigation”.

      As you may be aware, this investigation relates not only to whether the emails were in fact sent in September 2012 but also to whether there may have been acts by particular persons which amount to Misconduct in Public Office. The investigation necessarily includes an examination of events outside of the four corners of the purported email correspondence, since these may have the potential to confirm or refute the disputed email communications.

      The Investigative Team commenced investigations after .the purported emails were forwarded by the Honourable Prime Minister under cover of a letter dated May 20, 2013 to the acting Commissioner of Police, for investigation.

      Having acquired evidence, which in my view attained the appropriate evidentiary threshold, the investigators approached the Central Authority under cover of a letter dated 4th November 2014, for an application to be made for Mutual Legal Assistance.

      The United States Department of Justice, being of the view that the application was supported by evidence which met the required level of ‘probable cause’, applied for and received a warrant in the United States of America.

      This warrant was to be served on certain service providers, among them Google Inc. A response from the Department of Justice was received through the Central Authority by Deputy Commissioner of Police, Glen. Hackett on February 6th, 2015.

      Against this backdrop I wish to make the following observations:

      (i) While it is true, that after receipt of the information from the Department of Justice, the police team, led, by Superintendent Baldeo Nanan did send a report to Deputy Commissioner of Police Glen Hackett, it is not true that such report cleared Mr. Anand Ramlogan and Mrs. Kamla Persad-Bissessar in respect of this investigation. This is contrary to a report given by Nalini Seelal in the Trinidad and Tobago Newsday dated April 28th, 2015 at page 5.

      (ii) The United States Department of Justice’s response did not treat with all of the matters requested by the Investigative Team and further, the United States Department of Justice is yet to relay any information related to the Hotmail accounts “captaingarygriffith@hotmail.com” and “surujrambachan@hotmail.com”. They have indicated that such information will be sent as soon as possible. Quite properly, there was absolutely no finding made by the United States Department of Justice nor was any disclosed in written correspondence. The United States Department of Justice was concerned only with relaying the data or information that was received by virtue of the above-mentioned warrant. This is its legal remit.

      (iii) At this time the police investigation has not yet resulted in any finding, whether through the Mutual. Legal Assistance channels or otherwise, that the emails were or were not sent. To give the impression that there has been some finality in this regard is misleading.

      (iv) Any parallel investigation by interested parties and the public airing of the supposed results are palpably self-serving and bring to mind the need for the legal maxim, “no man should be a judge in his own cause”. This is a bedrock principle of natural justice, the rule of law and due process. It exists to ensure impartiality by the disqualification of potentially biased or interested parties in the investigations. Further, notwithstanding the fact that the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service has the institutional strength and history to withstand pressure from whatever source, the publication of this information derived from private sources, has the potential to interfere with the investigations being conducted by independent and impartial bodies, such as, the Integrity Commission and the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service. Moreover, it has the potential to interfere with the public perception of the soundness of these investigations.

      Finally, I feel compelled to indicate that given the status and standing of those persons whose names are raised in this investigation and the national attention that it has obviously generated, it is my view that a comprehensive and speedy resolution is warranted. However, the investigation can only proceed as quickly as evidence is gathered whether by way of mutual legal assistance or otherwise.

      Accordingly, it is my view that the police investigative team requires additional time to conclude their investigation. I note with interest that it has been reported in the media that the acting Police Commissioner and the Integrity Commission also share the view that more time is needed.

      I am ever mindful that public confidence in the certainty of the eventual findings, whatever the outcome, should be given primacy over expediency. It is therefore with the interest of the Trinidad and Tobago public foremost in mind that I urge all concerned whether directly or indirectly, to allow the police investigators the time and space to complete their investigations without fear, favour, malice, ill-will or hindrance.

      Joan Honore-Paul,

      Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions

      May 13, 2015

      • Over two years and the 31 emails going through due process. If the Parliament came to an end due process would not have matter. Rowley would have had in the Hansard records these accusations and it would have remain. It became clear that the Deputy DPP was not interested in proceeding at a quick enough pace. She had the information since March, it is just 31 emails.

        The DPP office is one of the most powerful office in the land. The DPP answers to no one but yesterday the bias became evident after Ramesh and his gang spoke she supported what they were saying essentially. Which brings to question is this office independent? I don’t think so maximum leader pulling the strings. He obviously in bed with that office, very dangerous when such an office becomes pollution. The DPP and Deputy DPP must be fired immediately they are not working for the public.

        • There I go again! I don’t know why I respond to this hard headed fool. Mamoo, your timing is of absolutely of no consequence to what is justice in Trinidad and Tobago. You are fool to continue in that regard. Let justice prevail.

        • Jerry C. Hussain

          I can see clearly now where you are coming.

  • This is not rocket science:

    “no man should be a judge in his own cause.”

    “This is a bedrock principle of natural justice, the rule of law and due process. It exists to ensure impartiality by the disqualification of potentially biased or interested parties in the investigations.”

    The PM and her band of lawyers know this. They just do not care and feel they could get away with this vile and contemptible conduct.

    None of this clears Rowley but how the PM is handling this reeks of desperation and has made herself and her government the greatest threat to law and order in the country.

  • “None of this clears Rowley but how the PM is handling this reeks of desperation and has made herself and her government the greatest threat to law and order in the country.”
    Just right

    Quit speaking in forked tongues ,just right,and so try to live up to your sobriquet.
    Tell us what exactly is Rowley to be cleared of? He made an accusation,and before he could fully present his case,was kicked off the parliamentary political stage,by undemocratic comedians.

    Yep the same bums who tried to suppress AG Rammy baby,ummmmm… Prisongate fiasco,by demonizing the messenger, Solicitor General Eleanor Donaldson-Honeywell.
    For those of you still curious,as to how this criminal, was able to purchase/import 4 Range rovers ,on a Cabinet minister salary,then look no further.

    http://m.guardian.co.tt/news/2014-05-04/reshmi-%E2%80%98prisongate%E2%80%99-fiasco-govt-still-maintains-strong-support-base

    They likewise use their powers, to try and destroy whistleblower Principal Sita Gajadharsingh Nanga ,who attempted to expose Kamla’s racist Spiritual guru ,Sat Maraj ,as he pushed his policy of discrimination against kids ,of Afro Kinky Head Nation ,’trying to attend ,his state financed schools.

    Thanks Principal Sita Gajadharsingh Nanga,for your pro humanist stance ,and push back against Dr Goopiesing,the other morally repugnant ,political scoundrel,masquerading as a caring Education Minister.
    You had more to lose ,than the Solicitor General,and yet,did not shy away from your civic duty-protection of our kids,unlike Kamla’s handpicked Field Marshall.

    http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/sat_blocked_black_children-133665408.html?m=y&smobile=y

    In ancestral India ,eloping 16 year old females ,with 35 year old married lovers ,are lynched,while in T&T ….well,your guess is as good as mine.
    The difference.is ,that our Police get blame ,even if scared witnesses ,refuse to testify. As such ,your decision to stand up , was commendable.

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-32732492

    Stay vigilant people!

    • Neal states:
      “Quit speaking in forked tongues ,just right,and so try to live up to your sobriquet.”
      and,
      “Tell us what exactly is Rowley to be cleared of?”

      They are still investigating these emails and besides trying to determine if they were real correspondences from the parties in question they also have to determine if Rowley knew the emails were false (the scope of the investigation is showing that he may not have been able to determine this). They also have to determine whether he fabricated them or was in cahoots with others to fabricate and spread lies. He is not in the clear until the investigations clear him of wrong doing.

  • “But dealing specifically with the issue of whether the case was close to an end, Honore-Paul said, “This investigation relates not only to whether the emails were in fact sent in September 2012 but also whether there may have been acts by particular persons which amount to misconduct in public office. “The investigation necessarily includes an examination of events outside of the four corners of the purported email correspondence, since these may have the potential to confirm or refute the disputed email communications.”

    Obviously she knows the emails are wrong so she is conducting an investigation outside the scope of what Dr.Rowley said in Parliament. So she is looking for content, oddly it is the same thing Al Rawi and Ramesh is saying. Her statement comes right after Ramesh spoke yesterday. Is there a conspiracy by the Assistant DPP to bring down the government? According to Rowley email her boss the DPP was not offered any post as a judge. Also the reporter was not killed. So if the emails are wrong and there are no victims. What is the b*tch investigating?

    And what about these cases Calder Hart, Pena, Karen Nunez Teshiera, LANDATE, Tarouba & CLICO, Joan Yuelles $50 million secret scholarship fund. What about Marlene and the $2.7 million disappearing, or Imbert and the long list of companies with his name. Why is it taking so long to put these people in jail.

  • “Why is it taking so long to put these people in jail?”
    Mamboo

    Simple /easy answer Mamboo.’What is good for de Crooked Caroni,or Caura goose,is likewise great for dem East Dry River ,by way of Manzanilla gander.’
    You want Anan Ramlogan,Howai,Harie Harinarine,Basdeo Panday,his close business pals ,Ish,and steve ,of Section 34 fame ,as well as ex Chief Justice Sharma,to stay out of jail ,for their well documented misdeeds,and so do tribalists,on the other side of de isle.
    Your PM ,and her PP gang ,came in to power on a platform of change,but want to ‘pick ,and choose,’ as to who should be deemed criminals. Is it only Wendy Fitzwilliams ,or some confuse Morvant young lady ,making idle threats ,to Kamla on Facebook ,because she cannot see her Nelson Street boyfriend?
    Jack FIFA Warner,was the most honest man on the planet,when he was financing your tribe’s party campaign,and allowing Kamla to ride his bare back,en route to power.
    Once he decided to kick her to the curb,for another more appealing,political broad ,we then knew ,how much of a bandit ,he suddenly was ,by said ungrateful bums.

    Just tell your leader ,to call the elections,and let the voting public that matters,make a decision,as to who they trust,or not!
    We know from early exit polls findings,that savvy Guyanese,led the way,by FINALLY kicking out Ramoutar,and his PPP,and hopefully T&T,will follow suit,and do the same, with their politically inept PM,and her PP gang.
    I love this land, Y tu?

  • Mamoo, you left dead horse O’Halloran. You should also mention Life Sport, Prisongate, the Finance Insider Trading, the ex-AG million dollar payout, among others.

    “Why is it taking so long to put these people in jail.” Be careful what you wish for Mamoo.

  • TMan, it sounds as though you already know who is guilty. The PM is investigating herself through her attorney. That to me is not a good sign. Stop embarrassing yourself and trying to fool big people. Do you expect one’s attorney to throw them under the bus?

    “The question is, can the DPP office and the Police be trusted in this investigation?” Suddenly, no trust in the DPP or the Police, who then will you trust? You sure as hell trust the PM’s attorney.

    However, I have the same question of trust. Which DPP or Police Commissioner have the testicular fortitude to arrest and charge a sitting Prime Minister and former Attorney General in Trinidad and Tobago?

    • Fronts, my man, those of us in the know are fully aware of the political affiliation of the attractive Depuuty. She is now large and in charge since the Sheriff recused himself.

  • I hope nobody on this blog involved because the passion coming out of some of these comments makes me wonder if some people here have something to lose or might possibly be personally involved. Hmmm…time will tell.

Comments are currently closed.