Dr. Camini Marajh, D.Litt?

By Dr. Selwyn R. Cudjoe
July 11, 2007

NewspapersThe University of the West Indies (UWI) at St. Augustine has awarded Miss Camini Maharj a Doctor of Letters (D.Litt) degree for a position she does not hold and in a field that does not exist. UWI’s website describes Miss Marajh as an “investigations editor” and tells us that she is worthy of one of the most coveted awards any recognized university can confer because she “has reported in depth,” not necessarily with distinction, “on a wide range of issues, including crime, the legislature, and the environment in Trinidad and Tobago” over the years.

Miss Maharj has never been an editor of a newspaper. She is an investigative reporter–not an “investigations editor”—and to the best of my knowledge there is no such field as “investigations” journalism. It may sound contradictory, but UWI is intent on granting Ms. Marajh an honorary doctorate in a field that does not exist. Yet, it is not of me to disagree with the wisdom of UWI and its principal.

But, there is a larger issue at stake.

In many parts of the world, an honorary degree is regarded as a serious matter. A “honoris causa” or “a mark of honor,” as it is called, it is awarded generally to someone who has made a distinguished contribution to her society and who, by association, is likely to bring a corresponding amount of eminence and distinction to the institution that confers the degree. At Georgetown University in the United States, an honorary degree is regarded as the most significant accolade it bestows upon someone. It is awarded to “distinguished individuals who merit special recognition for genuine achievement and distinction in a field of activity consonant with the mission of the university.” Among other things, the recipient of such a degree should be an “eminent” personage in a special field of scholarship, public service, literary achievement, and so on.

In the case of Ms. Marajh, UWI is not too concerned with such criteria. It does not tell us what her body of work is; what constitutes her eminence in journalism; the range of her journalistic experiences; what differentiates her from other journalists; and wherein lays her particular distinction. Certainly, her depth “in a wide range of issues,” whatever they are, does not lift her to a level of excellence that warrants the conferral of an honorary doctorate. Nor, for that matter, does it distinguish her from other journalists. She has never been an editor of a newspaper; has no presence outside of T&T; does not edit her own work; has never written a commentary; nor has she involved herself in any capacity other than writing “investigations” reports.

One can better understand Ms. Marajh’s limitation if we compare the narrowness of her achievements with those of George John, a former recipient of a UWI honorary degree, who was acclaimed by the region’s newspapers as the “Dean of Caribbean journalism.” His accomplishments included but were not limited to the following:

  • Instrumental in the formation of the Trinidad Express;
  • Chief Public Relations Officer of Eric Williams, former Prime Minister of T&T;
  • Port of Spain correspondent for the Jamaica Gleaner and later head of the Gleaner’s News Bureau in Port of Spain;
  • Relocated to the head office of the Gleaner in Kingston and assigned to cover two election campaigns of Norman Manley in the 1960s;
  • Worked as the Editor of the London Weekly Gleaner in the 1980s;
  • Senior Lecturer in Journalism at the Mona Campus of the University of West Indies;
  • General Manager of the Dominica Broadcasting Company;
  • Member of the Commonwealth Journalist Association;
  • Events analysts with the BBC
  • News analyst for Radio Trinidad and Trinidad and Tobago Television;
  • Analyst at ITV’s Super Channel on the British General Elections;
  • Author of Beyond the Frontlines;
  • Wrote for a newspaper in St. Vincent;
  • Debbie Ransome of the BBC Caribbean Service called him “one of the Caribbean’s most well–known journalists outside the region.”

There are several distinguished T&T journalists upon whom UWI could have conferred this coveted award if it wanted to honor genuine achievement and, in the process, uphold standards of excellence. Three names that grace the hallowed halls of T&T’s journalism come to mind:

  • Therese Mills: the first female editor of a national newspaper; a writer of children’s books; the founder of Newsday, one of the three most important newspapers in T&T today; the first female chairman and CEO of a media company in T&T;
  • Patrick Chokolingo: the father of investigative journalism in T&T; the person who gave birth to and developed weekly journalism in T&T; the first general manager of the Express; and one of the most dynamic journalists T&T has ever known;
  • Keith Smith: one of the more creative journalists in the country; a walking compendium of the nation’s culture who possesses an ability to place such material in a single column several times a week; his elevation and subsequent acceptability of Trinidad’s nation language (or dialect) by T&T’s public through his columns; drawing greater attention to the steel band and calypso by writing about them and giving them a prominent place in the newspaper he edits;

It is unfortunate that Ms. Marajh’s name should be mentioned in the same breath as the other recipients of this year’s award:

  • Chinua Achebe: the virtual innovator of the modern African novel; author of several novels including Things Fall Apart (1958); No Longer at Ease (1960); Arrow of God (1964); A Man of the People (1966); Anthills of the Savannah (1987); and Hopes and Impediments (1988), a book of essays; winner of the 2007 Man Booker International Prize for Fiction; a perennial contender for the Nobel Prize in Literature; taught at several universities in Nigeria and the United States;
  • Justice Desiree Patricia Bernard: the first female judge of the Caribbean Court of Justice; first female Chief Justice of Guyana; served as a member of the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women; a member of the International Association of Women’s Judges; Vice President of the International Federation of Women’s Lawyers; a member of the Caribbean Council of Legal Education; and a member of the Caribbean Bar Association;
  • Vera Baney, a ceramic artist and sculptor who has exhibited in Canada, the United Kingdom, T&T, USA and Yugoslavia.

These are the persons with whom Ms. Marajh is being honored. We are asked to believe that she represents the best and brightest that can be found in T&T and the Caribbean. By inference we are told that we ought not to be worried by the dumbing down of criteria when it comes to selecting someone for this prestigious honor; someone who pales in comparison with the persons I have suggested.

Several charges of racism, favoritism, the manipulation and/or reduction of standards are being brought against the UWI. I don’t know if it is fair to say that things have deteriorated since Dr. Bhoe Tewarie assumed the leadership of UWI. It is certainly true that Ms. Marajh does not meet the “mark of honor,” nor does she display the qualities of excellence and distinction that one requires of a recipient of a UWI Doctor of Letters. And that is a shame.

Dr. Tewarie and his committee may be unable to reconsider the conferral of a D.Litt on Ms. Maharj. However, they should know that such a gesture lowers the esteem of the university in the eyes of those who care for its welfare and its international reputation.

Professor Cudjoe’s email is scudjoe@wellesley.edu

http://www.trinicenter.com/Cudjoe/2007/1107.htm

4 thoughts on “Dr. Camini Marajh, D.Litt?”

  1. This goes to show one thing – the standards at UWI is constantly dropping. But an Honorary degree is not that big a deal as Dr. Cudjoe makes it out to be. It’s just another way of saying, “you didn’t actually complete the academic requirements for this but you doing it so long or so much that we will give you one because we have to share these things out once a year anyways.”

    Besides, Dr. Cudjoe should be one of the last persons to rag on people who receive a position or title and aren’t qualified for it.

  2. Dr. Cudjoe obviously is not aware of the numerous honorary degrees handed out by American universities in particular, to a whole bunch of “jokers” in the USA.
    Chill out , Cudjoe and stick to your usual racial rantings, or is this piece another racial rant disguised as journalism?
    Your deep-seated prejudice against others is neither constructive nor becoming of someone who aspires to intellectual pursuits.
    Get a life and try to offer positive and constructive commentary.

  3. One can bet money that you guys will creep, out of the woodwork to defend anything beneficial to an Indian, and attack any position advanced by an African. Doctor Cudjoe does not come from a bloodline mired in color and class discrimination. Look at yourself first and your history before resorting to displacing your learnings upon others. Boy, what a sorry bunch of bogotted hypocrites.

  4. I agree with Professor Cudjoe that Camini Marajh’s honorary(?) degree appears, on the face of it, entirely undeserved. She is a passable journalist but this does not normally qualify one for an honorary degree- if so, why not degrees for Kwame Laurence, Lasana Liburd, Keino Swamber, Darryl Heeralal and dozens of others? Why were accomplished journalists like Therese Mills overlooked?
    Yes, racial bias is a factor that deserves investigation.
    However, before we all jump on the bandwagon and declare this irregular degree-granting to be part of a wider racist plot, one must consider alternative explanations:
    – Was a bribe involved (money, land or other)?
    -Did the recipient have an affair with any senior university official?
    -Is the recipient a relative or friend of anyone involved in the process of granting honorary degrees?
    -Could the recipient have promised favorable newspaper coverage to someone involved in the process (or threatened someone with negative reporting if denied)?
    By all means- demand an investigation into ALL of the above possibilities.
    But, even as we move to condemn racism, favoritism and other forms of corruptions, let us not descend to the level of those we condemn.
    Ask ourselves honestly- would we be as outraged if the campus principal and the undeserving “honorary” degree recipient were both Chinese? or White? or Syrian? And if the answer is “no”…..are we ourselves showing bias?
    And, Mr. Daniels– you ARE a dedicated foe of racism– and as such, should you judge others based on their “bloodlines” And if you answer “yes”, are you able to keep your answer free of “realistic” or “scientific” racism”?

Comments are closed.