Peace unto all—at least for the Christmas

By Raffique Shah
December 20, 2017

Raffique ShahIt must have been at the funeral for a military colleague that Brigadier Joseph Theodore, then a minister in the Basdeo Panday administration, pulled me aside for private conversation, which he initiated by brusquely whispering in my ear: “Raf, you couldn’t £$&*g warn me about getting involved in politics?” I laughed, but Joe continued his mini-tirade about the underworld of politics in which one “had to tolerate so much s%$t” in contrast to the military, where order, discipline, rules and regulations reigned supreme, and where, generally, soldiers lived by codes of honour that implied implicit trust in one’s comrades.

Such standards did not exist among politicians, much to Theodore’s disappointment. “I feel sorry for them,” he said.

In response, I told Joe he should have noted that I spent five short years in the jungle of parliamentary politics, after which I “buss it”, never to seek or accept office again. It is a culture that is alien to the mores of military life, especially for professionals like Joe and me (among others) who had trained at one of the elite military colleges in the world, Britain’s Sandhurst. For two long, tough years, some of the finest staff and instructors had hammered into us the codes and principles of good conduct, honour and honesty, fairness and fearlessness, of leadership by example, always putting the interests of one’s men and one’s country before self.

This is not to paint all soldiers as paragons of virtue, and all politicians as scoundrels. Far from it, many officers and too many among the other ranks engage in unsavoury, sometimes criminal activities that bring their units into disrepute. Incidents in the latter category are occurring with alarming frequency.

But the ratio of military personnel who engage in misconduct when compared with politicians is miniscule. Indeed, public perception is that every politician is a crook, guilty unless proven innocent. Their infractions are not limited to corruption, but extend to nepotism, influence peddling, and most of all lying. They are compulsive liars. It’s an indispensible tool of their trade.

It must have been these latter traits, which are inextricably linked to the profession, not just locally, but globally, that upset Theodore, hence his bitterness over having to coexist with some of the most artful practitioners in the Panday administration.

Mark you, I don’t envy the buggers. I pity them. They serve at the pleasure of the electorate, which, in Trinidad and Tobago, seems to take a perverse delight in granting them no more than five years to play themselves before they bring them crashing to the ground, to the reality that power is but a fleeting illusion, that politicians’ shelf-lives are shorter than a “doubles” in a greedy Trini’s mouth.

In this regard I pity them because, caught between a restless, demanding population that has grown accustomed to living heavily subsidised lifestyles, and pontificating professionals who profess to have all the answers to economic and social challenges that are of global proportions, the politicians are dammed if they do, and damned if they don’t.

For instance, in the current situation where revenues, hence foreign exchange earnings, have plummeted, economists insist that the government must devalue the dollar, down to eight-to-one US dollar, some say ten-to-one, which Trinis know is murder. Because we import 90 percent of all we consume (food, clothes, furniture, appliances, toiletries etc), prices of all goods and services would axiomatically double—killing the poor and middle classes, but hardly wounding the wealthy.

Such drastic measure would be suicidal for the incumbents.

The trade unions say “not a man must go”, meaning that no workers, including those who were added to establishments that are grossly overstaffed and under-producing, many on short-term, politically-expedient contracts, must be terminated. That most state institutions and enterprises simply do not have the money to pay salaries is immaterial to the conversation.

Only the finance minister knows what magic he must weave every end-of-month to meet the billion-dollar salaries bill.

The “lochos” at the lower rungs of the socio-economic ladder insist they must get “wuk” where they don’t actually have to work, but must be paid (or they will burn tyres and block roadways). The government has no choice but to satiate this ogre they and their predecessors created, for fear of being branded inhumane.

Meanwhile, in millionaires’ row where the good life keeps rolling on whatever the state of the economy, luxury limousines line the garages of super-posh mansions and enclaves that are insulated from the crime rampage by high-tech security and hired guns. Conspicuous consumption continues unabated even as the elite insist that the government keep the restless natives in check, by whatever means necessary.

Throw them a hamper here, a bouncy castle there (oh, how I miss Glenn Ramadharsingh!). After all, ’tis the season of giving, ’tis Christmas time. If the natives cry out for bread, give them black cake or the crumbs thereof-and hope that among the mites there aren’t a few aiming real guns at you!

In the spirit of the season, regardless of the realities, I wish all—patricians, politicians and plebes—a peaceful, enjoyable Christmas.

3 Responses to “Peace unto all—at least for the Christmas”


  • Brother Shah, you tend to serenade your military past, but i personally don’t believe that you have ever pull the trigger to kill anyone in battle, i also don’t believe that you have ever had to leave your bed, and hit the bunker 2 a.m in the morn with missiles coming in, i also don’t believe that a bomb have ever exploded in your vicinity. The history of Sandhurst, is not one that i would put on my table, you see brother Shah, Sandhurst represented the oppressive arm of British Imperialism, a murderous institution that kept the code of conduct on behalf of suppression. From Africa to Asia, Sandhurst trained destitutes, some who have become criminal rejects, we know of the MAU MAU wars in JOMO KENYATTA’ liberation struggles in Kenya, we also saw how Sandhurst trained military upholders murdered thousands of unarmed Indians during the days of GHANDI, we also knew who was Lawrence of Arabia, and what he stood for. I have never met a military man, who, having killed, not living his later years in regret and spiritual brokeness. Sandhurst in truity? was to upkeep British conquest and their so-called Democracy. Politics have no set values, no morals, no friends or enemies, only common interest, this is the aspect of the science that the subjects have not adhered to. You see Brother Shah, in Europe and America, political parties are lily white, so they go along to get along, in Trinidad, the ethnic groups have not adapted, and thats the reason for the perils of division. Today, wanna be soldiers in Trinidad, RAPE, MURDER, ROB, KIDNAP, and much more,surely lacking in standards and codes, some of them. But again, their military doctrine was handed down , nothing Trinidad about it.PEACE ONLY COMES, WHEN THERE IS JUSTICE.

    • Brother Cooper, you are right on the money.

      Mr Shah is a member of the privileged psuedo left wing political class of the 1970s and 1980s who has been milking his Sandhurst credentials for his personal enrichment for an entire lifetime.

      His opinions were useless and irrelevant then and even more so at the present.

      it still surprises me that anyone bothers to read his rantings except for comic relief.

  • We must wish the politicians well this season and hope that one day they will see the light.
    We must live in hope that the darkness that poisons the heart,minds and souls of politicians will be dissolved.
    We must understand that politicians who have ravaged this nation will have to account in accordance with the law of cause and effect.
    We must know that politicians do not have all the answers to our problems but may make matters worse.
    Finally we the people must never become like politicians who never had any interest in national development and the well-being of the citizenry.

Comments are currently closed.