There’s is No Solace in the Land and Building Taxes Regime

By Stephen Kangal
September 11, 2013

Stephen KangalThe heart and soul, indeed the single most important determining factor in the calculation of the quantum of property taxation for each property is the year in which the requisite rental value -driven valuation was completed and applied. Finance Minister Larry Howai alluded to the fact that by the time residential properties are brought to book again by 2017 the relevant requisite up-to-date valuations will have been completed.

I find it rather puzzling and bizarre to hear the calls from both the Minister of Finance and the Honourable Prime Minister for the return or reinstatement of the repealed 1948 Land and Building Taxes Ordinance (L&B) as being a softer palliative and a superior more humane alternative to the PNM’s Act No.18 of 2009. In my view the L&B regime is more onerous and punitive and should be allowed to RIP.

What also is the position/status with Chapter V of the 1990 Municipal Corporations Act that constituted the legal basis for property tax determination and collection exclusively within the cities and boroughs and which was also repealed by the 2009 Act? Are not most of the industrial properties earmarked for 2014 taxation located within that jurisdiction? The L&B regime excludes the cities and boroughs.

The L&B regime imposes a taxation rate of seven and a half percent (7 1/2%) on the annual rateable or taxable value of properties that are based on a current rental values determination and not on the market values of the said property. It also charges ten dollars annually as land tax for properties of less than an acre.

But Act No.18 of 2009 provided for applying a three percent rate of tax reduced by more than half) on the annual taxable value of residential properties that was further reduced by ten percent contrary to the L&B regime. Accordingly it is in my summation a misrepresentation to suggest that the L&B regime should be reinstated as directed by the Honourable Prime Minister because it imposes a higher more onerous rate of tax pegged at 71/2 % on the prevailing rental value of properties and provides an illusionary and misleading soft-landing for potential and current residential property owners.

This L&B statutory relic should stay repealed and interned. A new property tax regime should be drafted based on the requisite widespread consultative process being undertaken with stake-holders.

5 thoughts on “There’s is No Solace in the Land and Building Taxes Regime”

  1. It’s funny that the Mr Kangal is the same person who called Act No.18 2009 “draconian” and even further: “These bills are clearly being introduced in clear defiance of the wishes of the majority of people of T&T. They also are geared to demonstrate sadistically who is the ultimate boss here in the face of rising and widespread dissent”

    The more things change….

  2. Dissent in ethnically confuse T&T? Please! Every year , since the ascension of Her Majestick Queen K ,to her proverbial throne , the ranks of homeless, unemployed , and disgruntled folks tumbling below the poverty has risen , but whether this would translate to anything , is anyone’s guess. Once more ,another escapist discussion , that has no relevance to the majority of Trinidadians , with no land reform, or urgent coherent socio economic policies no where in sight.
    If Uncle Kangall, wish to help his leader , he will advise her , to not only forget about Local elections, but most definitely ,a by election in St Joseph , as the PP , will surely loose , since they just made the unemployed ,ex Judge ,into a political martyr, via vindictive overkill.

  3. Sometimes politics take precedence over economics and this is well known to and embedded in the psyche of the PNM. The industrial property tax is contained in the said 2009 Act as well as the relief measures proposed for those unable to afford the residential tax. The 2009 Act was the distillation of years of technical studies and ideas and the route set may not be subject to change. The issue demonstrated how getting people involved in a national issue can result in a game changer.

  4. Nobody want to pay taxes in TnT but in Canada and the US they will happily pay the $3,000-$6000 per annum depending on the size of the house.

Comments are closed.