Trinidad and Tobago Bulletin Board
Homepage | Weblog | Trinbago Pan | Trinicenter | TriniView | Photo Gallery | Forums

View Trinidad and TobagoTriniSoca.comTriniView.comTrinbagoPan.com

Trinidad and Tobago News Forum

Chief Justice Sharma loses at the Privy Council

TrinidadAndTobagoNews.com Reporters
November 30, 2006

This morning Chief Justice Satnarine Sharma lost his appeal in the highest appellate court, the Privy Council, in London. Mr. Sharma's appeal was tried before five Law Lords arguing that the attempt to remove him from office was politically motivated by the Prime Minister, the Attorney General, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) and the Chief Magistrate.

The Privy Council ruled that there was no evidence to prove that there was collusion involving the Prime Minister, the Director of Public Prosecutions, the Attorney General and the Chief Magistrate. They were not convinced that the Chief Justice's complaint could not be fairly resolved within the criminal courts.

The Law Lords said that although the Deputy DPP's arguments are attractive it is up to the courts to assume that the issue raised by the Chief Justice is true. The Lords say in their opinion, the Chief Justice presented an arguable case and the evidence raised some important questions of constitutional law which demand further consideration.

The Law Lords said the Chief Justice was right in thinking that he had been threatened when the Prime Minister told him to demit office or face criminal charges. However, they said what is missing is evidence to suggest that there was any improper influence or conspiracy involving the Chief Magistrate, the Prime Minister or the Attorney General to prosecute him.

The Law Lords also said that up to this point there is nothing to suggest that the Prime Minister improperly sought to influence the outcome. The Law Lords said that they do not believe that the Chief Justice's complaints cannot be resolved within the criminal process and that this is not a case for Judicial Review but one to be heard before a Criminal Judge.

Chief Justice Sharma was ordered to pay cost.

The state can now move to arrest the Chief Justice without further interference.

Justice Sharma, who is accused of trying to pervert the course of public justice by attempting to sway the decision of Chief Magistrate Sherman Mc Nicolls in the Basdeo Panday integrity trial, went to the Privy Council and challenged attempts by the police and the Deputy Director of public prosecutions to arrest him.

Share your views in the Blog

Sharma's road to London

UPDATE:

$250.000 Bail for Chief Justice Satnarine Sharma
Chief Justice Satnarine Sharma has been charged with misbehavior in public office and is now on $250.000 bail. The Chief Justice maintains he did no wrong. The Chief Justice surrendered to the police to face the

Messages In This Thread

Chief Justice Sharma loses at the Privy Council
$250.000 Bail for Chief Justice Satnarine Sharma
Trinidad and Tobago News

NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Copyright © TrinidadandTobagoNews.com