|
Harry Partap is so right when he says "we cannot and should not be selective in being our brothers' keeper".
Now, where was he when Basdeo Panday attacked the journalists? He was no longer a journalist and did not care about the fate of Jones P Madeira and others.
When Panday attacked the teachers and called them criminals, he was not a teacher and therefore was not concerned? When Panday attacked the trade unionists, he was not a trade unionist and therefore was not concerned.
When Panday attacked and ridiculed Hulsie Bhaggan he was not concerned about the denigration of women. And we can go on interminably with his leader's list of outrageously personal and insulting attacks.
Can Mr Partap explain his utter silence in these issues? How shamelessly brazen and conveniently selective can Mr Partap be?
Esmond Jones
Valsayn
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 this material is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material
from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. |