There is one of you in every on-line forum, every town-meeting, and every community. Not contributing anything pertinent to the debate; no opinions, and no solutions, just objections. Not conscientious objection either, just incendiary assertions with subversive intent. Entire segments of our nation, Indo and Afro, have been marginalized, by successive pseudo-colonial, political regimes, does that mean we appease them by honoring unworthy expatriates. Had Mr. Naipaul made a home in this country and contributed some expertise, in his field, for the benefit of our society at large, I would have no objection to one of our landmarks bearing his name. The majority of your so-called underclass has probably never read Naipaul. If they did I doubt they would approve in-spite of their perception or subjective reality. All other nations honor those who honor them. Why should we be any different? It is not xenophobic. As for your other label, we’re already there if reality is “the marginalization of Indo-Trinidadians.”