By Clarence Rambharat
Story Updated: Oct 22, 2013 at 9:53 AM ECT
The local government elections are now over. During the campaign the AG revealed details of confidential information to which his office has access. He likely diminished the public's expectation that the State still holds an individual's privacy inviolable. In all of it, the PM, a defender of constitutional privacy in 2010, stood behind her AG, proclaimed him the "best man for the job" and yesterday watched her Partnership lose more ground.
Despite all the low-life campaigns the country has endured, the line between political picong and constitutional privacy remains as wide as the Caroni River. The AG did not stumble over this line in dealing with ILP deputy political leader Anna Deonarine-Rampersad. He strutted over it, armed with information deliberately accessed and packaged for political theatre. He embedded elements of money, greed and murder. And ultimately, he delivered a sobering reminder that, in the hands of the wrong person, power, access and information can be transformed into tools of political survival and personal ambition. Yesterday, voters took note.
|NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 this material is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material
from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. |