PNM nominated Professor Max Richards for speaker and he received 18 votes from the PNM and none from the UNC. Therefore he did not receive a negative vote.
UNC nominated Robin Montano and he received no votes from either the PNM or the UNC who nominated him.
PNM's Bureaux raised on a point of order in the parliament that Professor Max Richards did not receive a negative vote but the UNC's choice, Robin Montano, received a negative vote.
Under section 52 Standing order 3* of the constitution, the PNM can now seek leave to have the courts adjudicate on the matter on who should be the speaker of the house.
It seems that the UNC's strategy of not voting for the people they nominated may have backfired.
* I need to verify the correct section of the constitution.
|NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 this material is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material
from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. |