Comments on: Real Independence — Afri-centric View

By: aaagbormbai

aaagbormbai — Sat, 25 Aug 2012 12:56:43 +0000

This message is directed to Prof Kwame Nantambu. I’ve been trying to get a copy of your book “Egypt & Afrocentric Geopolitics : Essays on European Supremacy”

The book should cost $14.95, but unfortunately Amazon is selling it at 150-160 dollars/pounds-Sterling, which is way outside my reach.

Can you tell me where to buy the book at close to its original price? Or do you have a copy you can sell to me, even if it is used?

Thanks for your assistance.

Dr. A. A. Agbormbai

By: Davy de Verteuil

Davy de Verteuil — Sat, 25 Aug 2012 08:14:12 +0000

AI, There’s no one venue let alone The correct venue. Pointless you try to scapegoat the Gov’s disgraceful behaviour at the OAS. Also it would be much healthier had you raised the other issues pointed out i.e. PP’s High ranking party members that escaped Extradition to the US. You should have compare and defended the PP position on that.

You just don’t get it: It was a move to consensus and not on a basis of law. Haven’t you taken cue from the so call Friends of Syria high profile meetings lately: Western Governments are ganging up on small states thus developing countries are uniting and cooperating in many fields to safeguard their economy cultures sovereignty etc etc!

In fact the UN also have no binding law to force any country to accept or reject legitimate or illegitimate citizens. Trinidad&Tobago a disgraced betryal of the Latin American&Caribbean peoples:OAS backs Ecuador http://t.co/Iv8KMg4y

We were never a colonial service hub and if it is the Southern Americas are uniting after centuries of slavery, forced & Under paid labour citadel death squads funded & legitimise through foreign domination where on earth should T&T find its place? Clearly we have taken the side of aggressive unlawful posturing. What say you of the other majority states that took the view that a matter affecting the OAS should and can be discussed by member states?
You’re right about one thing, it was the name Trinidad and Tobago. I like calling a Temple a Temple

By: Al

Al — Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:33:42 +0000

I fail to see where Trinidad and Tobago (that is the name of the country) voted in favour of the extradition of Mr. Assange. They voted to not discuss it in the OAS. The correct venue is the UN since the UK is not a member of the OAS. The case also hinges on major international law and if the OAS will take on such an issue and the UN overturns it then what??

I agree with most of the comments of Mr. Nantambu, but we are also independent enough to not change everything that was done during our history. We can correct but I think changing everything from a certain era is a defeatism move. If it was part of our history then it is so. And we should name new things in other peoples honour. Why is it NAPA, why not call it the Hierryma Center for Performing Arts.

By: Davy de Verteuil

Davy de Verteuil — Wed, 22 Aug 2012 01:47:17 +0000

Trinidad US&Canada only 3 countries voted in favour of UK extradition of Julian Assange and opposed Ecuador’s political Assylum not to mention the UK/US un-diplomatic behaviour in the Ecuador embassy issue.
The PP Government refused to extradite two politically connected crime suspects to the US even though two of their proven accomplices have served time and have since been released.
Erick Williams must be spinning like a top in his grave.
Are we going to reopen Chaguaramas to the US so they could invade neighbouring States?
A disgusting Shame Shame Shame Shame!