<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thanks, But No Thanks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trinidadandtobagonews.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=6424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trinidadandtobagonews.com/blog/?p=6424</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:51:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoldStandard</title>
		<link>http://www.trinidadandtobagonews.com/blog/?p=6424&#038;cpage=1#comment-48973</link>
		<dc:creator>GoldStandard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 23:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trinidadandtobagonews.com/blog/?p=6424#comment-48973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I made the suggestion with my tongue firmly in my cheek. I was just pondering over a novel way to nudge democracy in the right direction. I think you&#039;ll agree the Bovilian model is probably a more appropriate method!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made the suggestion with my tongue firmly in my cheek. I was just pondering over a novel way to nudge democracy in the right direction. I think you&#8217;ll agree the Bovilian model is probably a more appropriate method!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoldStandard</title>
		<link>http://www.trinidadandtobagonews.com/blog/?p=6424&#038;cpage=1#comment-48972</link>
		<dc:creator>GoldStandard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 23:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trinidadandtobagonews.com/blog/?p=6424#comment-48972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your reply.  I think Boliva could be a contender for the title you suggest - &#039;Greatest proponet of democracy&#039;. In the last 13 years, the most repressed population in the western hemisphere (the indigenous population of Bolivia), which happens to be the majority, and has been totally marginalized for 500 years, ever since the Spanish, they managed to get themselves organized, active, and elected a president from their own ranks. Not some corrupt rich or power hungry, nepotistic crook guy. They developed programs, and the programs are serious, everybody knows what they are. On crucial issues: cultural rights, justice, multiculturalism, control of natural resources, really basic things. And furthermore, election is just one day in an ongoing process. On that day, they push the levers, but then they go back to the struggle they were part of before, struggles against privatization of water, and all sorts of things. That&#039;s a real, functioning democracy.

Compare that with your contender, the US; almost the opposite. Policies don&#039;t come from the public. They come from above. The public isn&#039;t supposed to know about them, and usually doesn&#039;t. So campaigns are run so they keep away from issues and talk about personalities, body language, and rhetoric, and that sort of thing. The front page of the New York Times has pictures of Michelle Obama wearing a designer dress in the morning, and a different one in the afternoon. That&#039;s what you&#039;re supposed to be interested in, not what&#039;s happening with healthcare, education or whatever else that effects everybodys lives.

James Madison’s position at the Constitutional Convention was that state power should be used &quot;to protect the minority of the opulent against the majority.&quot; That is why the Senate has only a hundred members who are mostly rich and were given a great deal of power. The House of Representatives, with several hundred members, is more democratic and was given much less power. Even liberals like Walter Lippmann, one of the leading intellectuals of the 20th century, was of the opinion that in a properly functioning democracy, the intelligent minority, who should rule, have to be protected from &quot;the trampling and the roar of the bewildered herd.&quot;

The big questions is are  Republicans and Democrats representing  just slight variations of the same political platform ? Of course there are differences, but they are not fundamental. Nobody should have any illusions. The United States has essentially a one-party system and the ruling party is the business party. 

Hope you find these  videos interesting:

http://vimeo.com/23086688

and

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnE8D3tgZ5c

All, are a &#039;must watch&#039;, including one more for luck

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOwZwkhFemQ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your reply.  I think Boliva could be a contender for the title you suggest &#8211; &#8216;Greatest proponet of democracy&#8217;. In the last 13 years, the most repressed population in the western hemisphere (the indigenous population of Bolivia), which happens to be the majority, and has been totally marginalized for 500 years, ever since the Spanish, they managed to get themselves organized, active, and elected a president from their own ranks. Not some corrupt rich or power hungry, nepotistic crook guy. They developed programs, and the programs are serious, everybody knows what they are. On crucial issues: cultural rights, justice, multiculturalism, control of natural resources, really basic things. And furthermore, election is just one day in an ongoing process. On that day, they push the levers, but then they go back to the struggle they were part of before, struggles against privatization of water, and all sorts of things. That&#8217;s a real, functioning democracy.</p>
<p>Compare that with your contender, the US; almost the opposite. Policies don&#8217;t come from the public. They come from above. The public isn&#8217;t supposed to know about them, and usually doesn&#8217;t. So campaigns are run so they keep away from issues and talk about personalities, body language, and rhetoric, and that sort of thing. The front page of the New York Times has pictures of Michelle Obama wearing a designer dress in the morning, and a different one in the afternoon. That&#8217;s what you&#8217;re supposed to be interested in, not what&#8217;s happening with healthcare, education or whatever else that effects everybodys lives.</p>
<p>James Madison’s position at the Constitutional Convention was that state power should be used &#8220;to protect the minority of the opulent against the majority.&#8221; That is why the Senate has only a hundred members who are mostly rich and were given a great deal of power. The House of Representatives, with several hundred members, is more democratic and was given much less power. Even liberals like Walter Lippmann, one of the leading intellectuals of the 20th century, was of the opinion that in a properly functioning democracy, the intelligent minority, who should rule, have to be protected from &#8220;the trampling and the roar of the bewildered herd.&#8221;</p>
<p>The big questions is are  Republicans and Democrats representing  just slight variations of the same political platform ? Of course there are differences, but they are not fundamental. Nobody should have any illusions. The United States has essentially a one-party system and the ruling party is the business party. </p>
<p>Hope you find these  videos interesting:</p>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/23086688" rel="nofollow">http://vimeo.com/23086688</a></p>
<p>and</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnE8D3tgZ5c" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnE8D3tgZ5c</a></p>
<p>All, are a &#8216;must watch&#8217;, including one more for luck</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOwZwkhFemQ" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOwZwkhFemQ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.trinidadandtobagonews.com/blog/?p=6424&#038;cpage=1#comment-48930</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trinidadandtobagonews.com/blog/?p=6424#comment-48930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to this philosophy democracy is dead.  The greatest proponent of democracy is the USA and according to the Supreme Court money rules.  But this has been the case for the longest time and we are now accepting it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to this philosophy democracy is dead.  The greatest proponent of democracy is the USA and according to the Supreme Court money rules.  But this has been the case for the longest time and we are now accepting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoldStandard</title>
		<link>http://www.trinidadandtobagonews.com/blog/?p=6424&#038;cpage=1#comment-48916</link>
		<dc:creator>GoldStandard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trinidadandtobagonews.com/blog/?p=6424#comment-48916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T &amp; T , you are part of a racket. T &amp; T Citizens are being conned on a daily basis.  Political parties have let you down. With your low population, valuable resources and true unity, you could be a shining light of the Caribean and the world. If you want real change, i would suggest:

1. Create an exhaustive database of the best &amp; brightest of Trinidadians from Trinidad and around the world. 

2. Ensure skill sets, experience, education &amp; achievements are reflected in the database.

3. Write an alogoritm to query the database to award political positions based on a set of rules in the database. 

There are 10&#039;s of not 100&#039;s of thousands of Trinidadians around the world that could be contenders for Minister of Education, Prime Minister or any other Government position.

This method of selection would help minimise the corruption we often see in politics. 

Private donations to political parties should be banned (except for donations that help support a powerful Ministry of (detecting &amp; preventing) Corruption.(The most effective way to restrict democracy is to transfer decision-making from the public arena to unaccountable institutions: kings and princes, priestly castes, military juntas, party dictatorships, or modern corporations).

T &amp; T &#039;fight&#039; for a true democracy , which means that the central institutions your society have to be under popular control rather than control from the top.

I hear you guys have a new political party. I hope the guy at the top is REAL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T &amp; T , you are part of a racket. T &amp; T Citizens are being conned on a daily basis.  Political parties have let you down. With your low population, valuable resources and true unity, you could be a shining light of the Caribean and the world. If you want real change, i would suggest:</p>
<p>1. Create an exhaustive database of the best &amp; brightest of Trinidadians from Trinidad and around the world. </p>
<p>2. Ensure skill sets, experience, education &amp; achievements are reflected in the database.</p>
<p>3. Write an alogoritm to query the database to award political positions based on a set of rules in the database. </p>
<p>There are 10&#8242;s of not 100&#8242;s of thousands of Trinidadians around the world that could be contenders for Minister of Education, Prime Minister or any other Government position.</p>
<p>This method of selection would help minimise the corruption we often see in politics. </p>
<p>Private donations to political parties should be banned (except for donations that help support a powerful Ministry of (detecting &amp; preventing) Corruption.(The most effective way to restrict democracy is to transfer decision-making from the public arena to unaccountable institutions: kings and princes, priestly castes, military juntas, party dictatorships, or modern corporations).</p>
<p>T &amp; T &#8216;fight&#8217; for a true democracy , which means that the central institutions your society have to be under popular control rather than control from the top.</p>
<p>I hear you guys have a new political party. I hope the guy at the top is REAL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
